Qualified name syntax/dot`.`tightfix
Quote from AntC on June 28, 2025, 4:22 amI presume
table.column
style has been in SQL since the beginning(s)?Where did that syntax come from? I'm having a hard time antedating it in computer languages or mathematical notation. There's some hints it was used in Iverson's APL (early '60's), but I can't find an example -- though APL exploited every possible syntax/glyph plus plenty that proved impossible.
Maybe from early machine-level languages? Byte-position within a machine word?
Principia Mathematica 1913 used
10.2.3
style for numbering propositions. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1921 used1.345
. But I'm looking forprename.subname
. So a symbolic name rather than a number.Was it always possible in SQL to use sth like
Supplier.SNO
,Qty.SNO
-- that is, samesubname
with differentprename
such that theprename
in effect acted as a namespace qualifier? (And so that in some sense it was the 'same'SNO
across different tables.)
I presume table.column
style has been in SQL since the beginning(s)?
Where did that syntax come from? I'm having a hard time antedating it in computer languages or mathematical notation. There's some hints it was used in Iverson's APL (early '60's), but I can't find an example -- though APL exploited every possible syntax/glyph plus plenty that proved impossible.
Maybe from early machine-level languages? Byte-position within a machine word?
Principia Mathematica 1913 used 10.2.3
style for numbering propositions. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus 1921 used 1.345
. But I'm looking for prename.subname
. So a symbolic name rather than a number.
Was it always possible in SQL to use sth like Supplier.SNO
, Qty.SNO
-- that is, same subname
with different prename
such that the prename
in effect acted as a namespace qualifier? (And so that in some sense it was the 'same' SNO
across different tables.)